首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact of pelvic floor muscle training on sexual function of women with urinary incontinence and a comparison of electrical stimulation versus standard treatment (IPSU trial): a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Impact of pelvic floor muscle training on sexual function of women with urinary incontinence and a comparison of electrical stimulation versus standard treatment (IPSU trial): a randomised controlled trial

机译:盆底肌训练对尿失禁女性性功能的影响以及电刺激与标准治疗的比较(IpsU试验):一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIMS: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of electric stimulation plus standard pelvic floor muscle training compared to standard pelvic floor muscle training alone in women with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. METHODS: Single centre two arm parallel group randomised controlled trial conducted in a Teaching hospital in England. Participants were women presenting with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. The interventions compared were electric stimulation versus standard pelvic floor muscle training. OUTCOME MEASURES: included Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual function Questionnaire (PISQ) physical function dimension at post-treatment (primary); other dimensions of PISQ, SF-36; EQ-5D, EPAQ, resource use, adverse events and cost-effectiveness (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: 114 women were randomised (Intervention n=57; Control group n=57). 64/114 (56%). PARTICIPANTS: had valid primary outcome data at follow-up (Intervention 30; Control 34). The mean PISQ-PF dimension scores at follow-up were 33.1 (SD 5.5) and 32.3 (SD 5.2) for the Intervention and Control groups respectively; with the Control group having a higher (better) score. After adjusting for baseline score, BMI, menopausal status, time from randomisation and baseline oxford scale score the mean difference was -1.0 (95% CI: -4.0 to 1.9; P=0.474). There was no differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes at follow-up. Within this study, the use of electrical stimulation was cost-effective with very small incremental costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). CONCLUSIONS: In women presenting with urinary incontinence in conjunction with sexual dysfunction, physiotherapy is beneficial to improve overall sexual function. However no specific form of physiotherapy is beneficial over another. Trial registration ISRCTN09586238.
机译:目的:评价与电尿疗法和性功能障碍女性相比,电刺激加标准骨盆底肌肉训练与标准骨盆底肌肉训练相比的临床和成本效益。方法:在英格兰的一家教学医院进行的单中心两臂平行组随机对照试验。参与者为出现尿失禁和性功能障碍的妇女。比较的干预措施是电刺激与标准骨盆底肌肉训练。观察指标:治疗后(主要)脱垂和失禁性功能问卷(PISQ)的身体机能维度; PISQ,SF-36的其他尺寸; EQ-5D,EPAQ,资源使用,不良事件和成本效益(次级结果)。结果:114名妇女被随机分组​​(干预组n = 57;对照组n = 57)。 64/114(56%)。参与者:随访时有有效的主要结局数据(干预30;对照组34)。干预组和对照组的平均PISQ-PF维度得分分别为33.1(SD 5.5)和32.3(SD 5.2)。对照组的得分更高(更好)。在调整基线评分,BMI,绝经状态,随机化时间和基线牛津量表评分后,平均差异为-1.0(95%CI:-4.0至1.9; P = 0.474)。随访时,两组在任何次要结局方面均无差异。在这项研究中,电刺激的使用具有成本效益,增量成本非常小,质量调整寿命年限(QALYs)。结论:对于伴有性功能障碍而出现尿失禁的女性,理疗可以改善整体性功能。但是,没有一种特定的物理疗法形式比另一种有益。试用注册ISRCTN09586238。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号